Janus v. AFSCME, Explained is produced by the Manhattan Institute.
From the Manhattan Institute‘s video description:
Daniel DiSalvo breaks down the wide-reaching implications of the upcoming Supreme Court case, Janus v. AFSCME. If the court rules in favor of the plaintiff, Mark Janus, an Illinois public worker, he and other non-union members will no longer be forced to pay agency fees. The case has enormous implications for the future of public unions, the balance of politics, and the fiscal stress on state and local governments.
Learn more here.